Evidence Proof And Judicial Review In Eu Competition Law Pdf

File Name: evidence proof and judicial review in eu competition law .zip
Size: 13918Kb
Published: 18.03.2021

This Quickguide summarises the procedure followed by the European Commission when investigating a suspected breach of EU competition law, the possible outcomes of an investigation, and key rights of defence which must be respected.

Please note that ebooks are subject to tax and the final price may vary depending on your country of residence. What rules or principles govern the assessment of evidence in EU competition enforcement? This book offers, for the first time, a comprehensive academic study on the topic. Its aim is twofold. Firstly, it produces a typology of evidence standards in competition proceedings at the EU level, thereby systemising the guidance that is currently dispersed in the case-law of the EU Courts.

Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in EU Competition Law

Many scholars see the two leading antitrust regimes as completely different, explaining that US antitrust law prioritizes the protection of the competitive market process while EU law focuses on the consumer at the expense of dynamic competition. The intention here is to argue the exact opposite, to suggest that in reality the two systems are not so different and, moreover, that they are getting closer. Major Issues regarding Monopolization. There are several reasons why large companies are so popular: they employ more people, pay them higher salaries, create most of the products we use, do most of the research and development, pay many of the taxes etc. On the other hand, they are also seen as huge companies crowding new businesses out of the market.

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI: Torre and E. Torre , E.

Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in EU Competition Law

Fernando Castillo de la Torre and Eric Gippini Fournier, two of the most experienced competition litigators at the European Commission, undertake an in-depth analysis of the case law of the EU Courts on the rules of evidence, proof and judicial review, as they are applied in EU competition law. These topics often engage with fundamental rights, and the book takes stock of the most frequent criticisms that are made of the EU enforcement system and review by EU Courts. The result is an extremely thorough and well-structured review of the relevant rules of law and of the precedents. The authors combine valuable insights and critical analysis to construct a definitive yet balanced portrayal of the state of EU competition law. Table of legislation. Burden and standard of proof. Probative value of the different evidentiary means.

Use of this Web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions. Special Issues. Contact Us. Change code. International Journal of Law and Society.


PDF | On Oct 1, , Sílvia Bessa Venda published Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in EU Competition Law by Fernando Castillo de la.


Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement

This section selects books on themes related to competition laws and economics. The survey usually covers publication over the last three months after publication of the latest issue of Concurrences. Publishers, authors and editors are welcome to send books to stephane. This new book edited by Fernando Castillo de la Torre and Eric Gippini Fournier, gives a very interesting and practical overview of the rules of evidence and proof in EU competition law applied by the EU Courts as well as the rules circumscribing the judicial review that they carry out. Evidence is defined as an available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid and being more of a suggestive nature and proof will be defined as arguments establishing a fact or the truth of a statement and being more of a concrete and conclusive nature.

How is evidence assessed in EU competition enforcement? This is the question that this important new book answers by offering the first systematic and comprehensive study on the topic. The aim of the book is twofold.

This paper examines different issues relating to evidence, proof and judicial review, having certain recent criticisms in mind.

Полагаю, Росио и ее гость ушли на вечернюю прогулку. Если вы оставите для нее записку, она получит ее прямо с утра.  - Он направился к полке с ячейками для ключей и почты. - Быть может, я мог бы позвонить в номер и… - Простите, - сказал консьерж, и вся его любезность мгновенно улетучилась.

 Сьюзан, - услышал он собственный голос, - Стратмор - убийца. Ты в опасности. Казалось, она его не слышала. Хейл понимал, что говорит полную ерунду, потому что Стратмор никогда не причинит ей вреда, и она это отлично знает.

Хейл в ужасе тотчас понял свою ошибку. Стратмор находится на верхней площадке, у меня за спиной. Отчаянным движением он развернул Сьюзан так, чтобы она оказалась выше его, и начал спускаться. Достигнув нижней ступеньки, он вгляделся в лестничную площадку наверху и крикнул: - Назад, коммандер.

Этот разговор был ей неприятен. - Ну, мы не сумели этого сделать. - А вдруг Танкадо умнее. - Может .

Агенты сейчас будут .

1 Response

Leave a Reply